Text of the provision

Art. 374. In case of identity of names and surnames, the younger person shall be obliged to use such additional name or surname as will avoid confusion.

Civil Code of the Philippines, Republic Act No. 386, approved June 18, 1949, effective August 30, 1950. Reproduced in full; verified verbatim against the LawPhil and ChanRobles official-text renderings.

What this article means

Where two people have identical names and surnames, the younger person is obliged to add a name or surname sufficient to avoid confusion.

The rule addresses a practical problem of civil records and public identification rather than any wrongdoing by either person — an older person’s prior use of a name is not disturbed, and the burden of adding a distinguishing name or surname falls on whoever came later, such as a son sharing his father’s full name. The article does not prescribe what the addition must look like, leaving the choice of a suffix or other distinguishing mark to the person obliged to make it.

Questions about this provision

Related provisions

Cases interpreting this article

Note. The text of the provision above is reproduced in full from the official enactment (Republic Act No. 386), verified against the LawPhil and ChanRobles renderings. The annotation and commentary around it are the work of Vivas & Nobles Law Office and are general legal information, not legal advice. How a provision applies to a particular situation depends on facts that only a lawyer reviewing your case can assess.