Text of the provision

Art. 367. Natural children by legal fiction shall principally employ the surname of the father.

Civil Code of the Philippines, Republic Act No. 386, approved June 18, 1949, effective August 30, 1950. Reproduced in full; verified verbatim against the LawPhil and ChanRobles official-text renderings.

What this article means

As originally enacted, natural children by legal fiction principally employed the surname of the father.

The phrase legal fiction flags that this category did not arise from the ordinary definition of a natural child — the law extended a comparable status to certain other children even though their parents’ circumstances did not actually meet that definition, so that they could receive analogous treatment, including the surname rule stated here. The result was to make the father’s surname the default across a wider range of children born outside marriage than the strict definition of “natural child” would otherwise cover.

How this article reads today. The category of ‘natural child by legal fiction’ no longer exists. Under Articles 163 and 165 of the Family Code there is a single class of illegitimate children, whose surname is governed by Article 176 of the Family Code as amended by Republic Act No. 9255.

Questions about this provision

Related provisions

Cases interpreting this article

Note. The text of the provision above is reproduced in full from the official enactment (Republic Act No. 386), verified against the LawPhil and ChanRobles renderings. The annotation and commentary around it are the work of Vivas & Nobles Law Office and are general legal information, not legal advice. How a provision applies to a particular situation depends on facts that only a lawyer reviewing your case can assess.