Text of the provision
Art. 2219. Moral damages may be recovered in the following and analogous cases:
(1) A criminal offense resulting in physical injuries;
(2) Quasi-delicts causing physical injuries;
(3) Seduction, abduction, rape, or other lascivious acts;
(4) Adultery or concubinage;
(5) Illegal or arbitrary detention or arrest;
(6) Illegal search;
(7) Libel, slander or any other form of defamation;
(8) Malicious prosecution;
(9) Acts mentioned in article 309;
(10) Acts and actions referred to in articles 21, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, and 35. The parents of the female seduced, abducted, raped, or abused, referred to in No. 3 of this article, may also recover moral damages. The spouse, descendants, ascendants, and brothers and sisters may bring the action mentioned in No. 9 of this article, in the order named.
Civil Code of the Philippines, Republic Act No. 386, approved June 18, 1949, effective August 30, 1950. Reproduced in full; verified verbatim against the LawPhil and ChanRobles official-text renderings.
What this article means
Moral damages may be recovered in ten enumerated cases and analogous ones — including a criminal offense resulting in physical injuries, quasi-delicts causing physical injuries, seduction, abduction, rape, adultery, illegal arrest or detention, malicious prosecution, libel, and the acts referred to in Articles 21, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34 and 35. Parents may also recover for a child's spurious status.
Questions about this provision
Related provisions
- Article 2218 — Sentimental Value Considered.
- Article 2220 — Moral Damages for Breach of Contract in Bad Faith.
Cases citing this article
- People of the Philippines vs. XXX262376 and YYY262376, G.R. No. 262376, April 2,2025 — read the decision on LawPhil →
- Manila Electric Company (Meralco) vs. Lucy Yu, Represented By Her Attorney-In-Fact, Dennis Encarnacion, G.R. No. 255038, June 26, 2023 — read the decision on LawPhil →
- Sps. Dionisio Estrada and Jovita R. Estrada vs. Philippine Rabbit Bus Lines, Inc. and Eduardo R. Saylan, G.R. No. 203902, July 19, 2017 — read the decision on LawPhil →
- Eduardo P. Manuel vs. People of the Philippines, G.R. No. 165842, November 29, 2005 — read the decision on LawPhil →
- Reynaldo Villafuerte, et al. vs. Hon. Court of Appeals, et al, G.R. No. 134239, May 26, 2005 — read the decision on LawPhil →
Compiled automatically from Supreme Court decisions published on LawPhil that expressly cite this article, most frequently cited first. A listing means the decision cites the provision — it is not a statement that the case is the leading authority, and it does not show whether a ruling has since been modified or abandoned. Always read the decision itself.