Short answer. No, generally. The obligation of warranty among co-heirs ceases when the eviction is due to a cause subsequent to the partition, or has been caused by the fault of the distributee of the property — since you say the loss was your own doing, your co-heirs' warranty obligation does not cover it.
What the law says
When the eviction is due to a cause subsequent to the partition, or has been caused by the fault of the distributee of the property.
Civil Code, Article 1096 — When Warranty Ceases. Read the full provision →
Your own fault falls squarely within this exception
The statute lists specific situations where the obligation of warranty among co-heirs ceases entirely, and one of them is exactly your situation: where the eviction has been caused by the fault of the distributee of the property — that is, the heir who received the property and lost it through their own doing. Because you say something you did wrong caused the loss, this exception applies, and your co-heirs are not obligated to warrant you against that loss.
The related ground: causes arising after the partition
The same clause also covers eviction due to a cause subsequent to the partition. Warranty among co-heirs is generally meant to protect against defects or claims that existed at the time property was divided, not against new problems that arose only afterward. A cause that developed after the partition took effect — separate from any fault on your part — likewise falls outside what the other co-heirs are obligated to make good.
Why the law draws this line
Warranty among co-heirs exists to make sure the division of an estate was fair — each heir should actually receive and keep what the partition assigned, undisturbed by defects that existed at that time and were beyond any individual heir's control. Extending that protection to losses an heir brought upon themselves, or to problems that arose only after the estate had already been fairly divided, would ask the other co-heirs to insure against outcomes they had no part in causing and no ability to prevent.
What this does not resolve
This provision addresses when the warranty among co-heirs specifically stops applying — it does not decide whether some other, unrelated remedy might be available to you, nor does it revisit the fairness of the original partition itself. If the fault genuinely traces back to your own conduct after receiving the property, this article simply confirms that the co-heirs' warranty obligation, as such, does not extend to covering that particular loss, and you would need some other legal basis, unrelated to this warranty, to seek any recovery from your co-heirs.