Text of the provision

Art. 137. Prohibited acts. It shall be unlawful for any employer: To deny any woman employee the benefits provided for in this Chapter or to discharge any woman employed by him for the purpose of preventing her from enjoying any of the benefits provided under this Code. To discharge such woman on account of her pregnancy, or while on leave or in confinement due to her pregnancy; To discharge or refuse the admission of such woman upon returning to her work for fear that she may again be pregnant.

Labor Code of the Philippines, Presidential Decree No. 442, as amended. Reproduced in full from the official enactment and verified against the LawPhil and ChanRobles renderings.

What this article means

An employer may not deny a woman employee the benefits of this chapter, nor dismiss her to prevent her from enjoying them. It is likewise unlawful to discharge her because of pregnancy or while she is on leave or in confinement, or to refuse to take her back when she returns to work out of fear that she may become pregnant again.

Questions about this provision

Related provisions

A note on article numbers. The articles of the Labor Code have been administratively renumbered, so the same provision is often cited under a different number. Supreme Court decisions write both, in the form “Article 297 [282]” — the new number first, the original in brackets. The text on this page is published under its original number, which is the numbering both source texts use. When citing, check which numbering your source follows.

Cases interpreting this article

Note. The text of the provision above is reproduced in full from the official enactment (Presidential Decree No. 442), verified against the LawPhil and ChanRobles renderings. The Labor Code has been amended many times; this page reproduces the text as those sources carry it. The annotation and commentary around it are the work of Vivas & Nobles Law Office and are general legal information, not legal advice. How a provision applies to a particular situation depends on facts that only a lawyer reviewing your case can assess.