Text of the provision

Art. 92. The following shall be excluded from the community property:

(1) Property acquired during the marriage by gratuitous title by either spouse, and the fruits as well as the income thereof, if any, unless it is expressly provided by the donor, testator or grantor that they shall form part of the community property;

(2) Property for personal and exclusive use of either spouse. However, jewelry shall form part of the community property;

(3) Property acquired before the marriage by either spouse who has legitimate descendants by a former marriage, and the fruits as well as the income, if any, of such property.

(201a)

Family Code of the Philippines, Executive Order No. 209, approved July 6, 1987. The Code took effect on August 3, 1988 (Republic v. Orbecido III, G.R. No. 154380, October 5, 2005). Reproduced in full.

What this article means

Article 91 makes the community sweeping; Article 92 lists the exceptions — the property that stays separate. Three categories. Property received during the marriage by gratuitous title (gift or inheritance), and its fruits, unless the giver says otherwise (1); property for a spouse's personal and exclusive use — but pointedly not jewelry, which is community (2); and property brought in by a spouse who has legitimate descendants from a former marriage, protecting that first family's eventual inheritance (3).

The jewelry rule in (2) is the one people miss: however personal, jewelry belongs to the community. And (3) is a quiet but important protection for children of a prior marriage.

Related provisions

Cases interpreting this article

Note. The text of the provision above is reproduced in full from the official enactment. The annotation, case summaries and commentary around it are the work of Vivas & Nobles Law Office and are general legal information, not legal advice. Whether this provision applies to a particular marriage depends on facts that only a lawyer reviewing your situation can assess.