Text of the provision
Art. 34. No license shall be necessary for the marriage of a man and a woman who have lived together as husband and wife for at least five years and without any legal impediment to marry each other. The contracting parties shall state the foregoing facts in an affidavit before any person authorized by law to administer oaths.
The solemnizing officer shall also state under oath that he ascertained the qualifications of the contracting parties are found[sic] no legal impediment to the marriage.
(76a)
Family Code of the Philippines, Executive Order No. 209, approved July 6, 1987. The Code took effect on August 3, 1988 (Republic v. Orbecido III, G.R. No. 154380, October 5, 2005). Reproduced in full. In the final sentence the official text reads "are found," evidently a printing error for "and found," carried identically by LawPhil and ChanRobles; it is marked [sic].
What this article means
Closing the chapter of license-exempt marriages, Article 34 dispenses with a license for a man and woman who have lived together as husband and wife for at least five years, with no legal impediment to marry each other throughout that period. The parties state these facts in a sworn affidavit, and the solemnizing officer separately swears that they ascertained the parties' qualifications and found no impediment.
Courts read the five-year requirement strictly: it must be a continuous, exclusive cohabitation as husband and wife for the full period, not an on-and-off relationship or one where either party was married to someone else during any part of it. A false affidavit of cohabitation does not cure the absence of a license — the marriage remains void under Article 35(3) for want of one.
Questions about this provision
Related provisions
- Article 27–Article 33 — the other license-exempt marriages in this chapter.
- Article 35 — marriages void for want of a genuine license, including a falsely claimed cohabitation exemption.
Cases citing this article
- Leonila G. Santiago vs. People of the Philippines, G.R. No. 200233, July 15, 2015 — read the decision on LawPhil →
- Flora L. Tubera-balintec vs. Heirs of Cesar L. Tubera, G.R. No. 235701, February 15, 2023 — read the decision on LawPhil →
- Rommel Genio y Santos vs. People of the Philippines, G.R. No. 261666, January 24, 2024 — read the decision on LawPhil →
- Sue Ann Bounsit-Torralba vs. Joseph B. Torralba Republic Of The Philippines, Oppositor-, G.R. No. 214392, December 7,2022 — read the decision on LawPhil →
- Reinel Anthony B. de Castro vs. Annabelle Assidao-de Castro, G.R. No. 160172, February 13, 2008 — read the decision on LawPhil →
Compiled automatically from Supreme Court decisions published on LawPhil that expressly cite this article, most frequently cited first. A listing means the decision cites the provision — it is not a statement that the case is the leading authority, and it does not show whether a ruling has since been modified or abandoned. Always read the decision itself.