Text of the provision

Art. 7. Laws are repealed only by subsequent ones, and their violation or non-observance shall not be excused by disuse, or custom or practice to the contrary.

When the courts declared a law to be inconsistent with the Constitution, the former shall be void and the latter shall govern.

Administrative or executive acts, orders and regulations shall be valid only when they are not contrary to the laws or the Constitution.

(5a)

Civil Code of the Philippines, Republic Act No. 386, approved June 18, 1949, effective August 30, 1950. Reproduced in full; verified verbatim against the LawPhil and ChanRobles official-text renderings. (LawPhil renders "declared" for "declare"; the two sources are otherwise word-identical and the provision is in force.)

What this article means

This article states the hierarchy of legal norms. A statute can only be repealed by another statute — never by mere disuse, custom, or practice; a law long ignored is still binding until Congress repeals it. Above statutes stands the Constitution: a law found inconsistent with the Constitution is void, and the Constitution governs. Below statutes stand administrative and executive issuances, which are valid only when they conform to the laws and the Constitution.

Related provisions

Cases interpreting this article

Note. The text of the provision above is reproduced in full from the official enactment (Republic Act No. 386), verified against the LawPhil and ChanRobles renderings. The annotation and commentary around it are the work of Vivas & Nobles Law Office and are general legal information, not legal advice. How a provision applies to a particular situation depends on facts that only a lawyer reviewing your case can assess.