Text of the provision
Art. 1539. The obligation to deliver the thing sold includes that of placing in the control of the vendee all that is mentioned in the contract, in conformity with the following rules: If the sale of real estate should be made with a statement of its area, at the rate of a certain price for a unit of measure or number, the vendor shall be obliged to deliver to the vendee, if the latter should demand it, all that may have been stated in the contract; but, should this be not possible, the vendee may choose between a proportional reduction of the price and the rescission of the contract, provided that, in the latter case, the lack in the area be not less than one-tenth of that stated. The same shall be done, even when the area is the same, if any part of the immovable is not of the quality specified in the contract. The rescission, in this case, shall only take place at the will of the vendee, when the inferior value of the thing sold exceeds one-tenth of the price agreed upon. Nevertheless, if the vendee would not have bought the immovable had he known of its smaller area of inferior quality, he may rescind the sale.
(1469a)
Civil Code of the Philippines, Republic Act No. 386, approved June 18, 1949, effective August 30, 1950. Reproduced in full; verified verbatim against the LawPhil and ChanRobles official-text renderings.
What this article means
In a sale of realty at a certain price per unit of measure, the vendor must deliver all the area stated; if he cannot, the buyer may take a proportional price reduction or rescind (rescission only if the lack is at least one-tenth, or on inferior quality).
Related provisions
- Article 1538 — Loss/Improvement Before Delivery.
- Article 1540 — Excess Area in a Unit-Price Sale.
Cases citing this article
- Cebu Windland Development Corporation vs. Ong Siao Hua, G.R. No. 173215, May 21, 2009 — read the decision on LawPhil →
- Rudolf Lietz, Inc., vs. The Court of Appeals, et al, G.R. No. 122463, December 19, 2005 — read the decision on LawPhil →
- Spouses Lucia A. Orozco and Cresente R. Orozco (deceased), substituted by his heirs, namely:, G.R. No. 222616, April 3, 2019 — read the decision on LawPhil →
Compiled automatically from Supreme Court decisions published on LawPhil that expressly cite this article, most frequently cited first. A listing means the decision cites the provision — it is not a statement that the case is the leading authority, and it does not show whether a ruling has since been modified or abandoned. Always read the decision itself.