Short answer. The State inherits it. Article 1011 provides that in default of persons entitled to succeed, the State shall inherit the whole estate, and Article 1013 assigns the personal property to the municipality or city where the deceased last resided and the real estate to where it is situated.

What the law says

In default of persons entitled to succeed in accordance with the provisions of the preceding Sections, the State shall inherit the whole estate.

Civil Code, Article 1011 — The State Inherits Last. Read the full provision →

What the law says

After the payment of debts and charges, the personal property shall be assigned to the municipality or city where the deceased last resided in the Philippines, and the real estate to the municipalities or cities, respectively, in which the same is situated.

Civil Code, Article 1013 — Where the Property Goes. Read the full provision →

The State stands at the end of the queue

Article 1011 places the State last, not first: it inherits in default of persons entitled to succeed in accordance with the provisions of the preceding Sections. Everything else in the law of intestate succession has to be exhausted before this provision is reached — descendants, ascendants, the surviving spouse, then brothers and sisters and their children, then remoter collateral relatives up to the degree the Code allows. The State does not compete with those heirs or take a share alongside them. It takes the whole estate, and only when there is genuinely nobody left who qualifies.

Where the property actually goes

Article 1013 is more specific than "the government". After the payment of debts and charges, the personal property shall be assigned to the municipality or city where the deceased last resided in the Philippines, and the real estate to the municipalities or cities, respectively, in which the same is situated. So an estate can be split among several local governments, according to where each parcel of land lies. Where the deceased never resided in the Philippines, the whole estate is assigned to the localities where the property is located. Debts are settled before any of this happens.

It is earmarked, not general revenue

The article does not leave the local government free to spend the estate as it likes. The property is to be for the benefit of public schools, and public charitable institutions and centers in those municipalities or cities, and the court distributes it as the respective needs of each beneficiary may warrant. The article also allows the court, at the instance of an interested party or on its own motion, to order the establishment of a permanent trust so that only the income from the property is used — which is how a substantial estate can be made to keep producing rather than be spent once.

"No relatives at all" is a high bar

In practice these estates are rare, because the net the Code casts is wide: it reaches past the immediate family to collateral relatives within the fifth degree, which takes in cousins and their children. A person who died apparently alone very often has heirs who simply do not know it. So before anyone treats an estate as ownerless, the family tree should be built properly from civil registry records on both the paternal and maternal sides. And an heir who surfaces after the State has taken over is not necessarily too late — a separate provision gives a window for claiming.

Cases citing this provision

These Supreme Court decisions cite the provision above. We list them so you can read them yourself; the summaries of what each decided are not ours to give.

Related provisions

Note. Statute text quoted on this page is reproduced from the official enactment and is linked to the full provision. The explanation around it is general legal information from Vivas & Nobles Law Office, not legal advice. Whether it applies to your situation depends on facts only a lawyer reviewing them can assess.