Short answer. There is an offence for it. Article 271 punishes anyone who induces a minor to abandon the home of his parents or guardians or the persons entrusted with his custody. The crux is inducement — the person must have brought the departure about, not merely known of it.

What the law says

shall be imposed upon anyone who shall induce a minor to abandon the home of his parents or guardians or the persons entrusted with his custody

Revised Penal Code, Article 271 — Inducing A Minor To Leave Home. Read the full provision →

What the article actually requires

Article 271 is directed at anyone who shall induce a minor to abandon the home of his parents or guardians or the persons entrusted with his custody. Three things are packed into that. The child must be a minor. The home left must be that of a parent, a guardian, or someone the child's custody was entrusted to — so the provision protects the custodial arrangement rather than any particular address. And the departure must have been induced. That last word is where these cases are won and lost.

Inducement is more than involvement

To induce is to bring about — to persuade, prevail upon, or move the minor to go. A person who takes in a child who had already decided to leave, or who gave a lift, or who knew and said nothing, has not necessarily induced anything, however unwelcome their conduct was. That is a genuinely narrow requirement, and it is worth measuring your own account against it honestly before proceeding, because a complaint that proves everything except inducement proves the wrong thing. What was said to the child, by whom, and when it was said is the heart of it.

Where a parent is the one responsible

The article deals separately with the situation where the person responsible is the minor's own father or mother, providing a different and lighter treatment for that case. This matters where a child has been drawn away in the course of a custody dispute or a separation between the parents, which is a common setting for the question. Those situations usually raise custody issues as well, governed by an entirely different body of law, and the two are best looked at together rather than by pursuing one and discovering the other later.

What is most useful to bring

The child's birth certificate, which establishes minority at the relevant date; whatever shows who had custody; and above all the communications — messages, chats, call logs, social media exchanges — between the child and the person concerned, in their original form and with their timestamps intact. Screenshots lose metadata, so preserve the device or the account access if you can. Take that to a lawyer promptly. If the child's safety is presently in question, that is a matter for the authorities now, not for a later filing.

Related provisions

Note. Statute text quoted on this page is reproduced from the official enactment and is linked to the full provision. The explanation around it is general legal information from Vivas & Nobles Law Office, not legal advice. Whether it applies to your situation depends on facts only a lawyer reviewing them can assess.