Short answer. Unless the judgment is ordered immediately executory, a motion for execution may only be filed in the proper court after the judgment's entry. For appealed cases, if execution pending appeal is sought while the Court of Appeals still holds the record, it transmits its resolution and a certified judgment copy to the court of origin to issue the writ.

What the law says

Except where the judgment or final order or resolution, or a portion thereof, is ordered to be immediately executory, the motion for its execution may only be filed in the proper court after its entry.

Rule 51, Section 11 — Execution of judgment. Read the full provision →

What the law says

where the motion for execution pending appeal is filed in the Court of Appeals at a time that it is in possession of the original record or the record on appeal, the resolution granting such motion shall be transmitted to the lower court from which the case originated, together with a certified true copy of the judgment or final order to be executed, with a directive for such court of origin to issue the proper writ for its enforcement.

Rule 51, Section 11 — Execution of judgment. Read the full provision →

Execution ordinarily waits for entry

Section 11 ties the ordinary timing for execution to entry of judgment. Except where the judgment or final order or resolution, or a portion thereof, is ordered to be immediately executory, the motion for its execution may only be filed in the proper court after its entry. Barring an immediate-execution order, a winning party generally must wait until entry before moving for execution.

Execution pending appeal, while the CA holds the record

A different procedure applies to execution sought while the appeal is still ongoing. Where the motion for execution pending appeal is filed in the Court of Appeals at a time that it is in possession of the original record or the record on appeal, the resolution granting such motion shall be transmitted to the lower court from which the case originated, together with a certified true copy of the judgment or final order to be executed, with a directive for such court of origin to issue the proper writ for its enforcement.

Original actions have their own execution route

Section 11 also notes that in original actions in the Court of Appeals, the writ of execution itself is accompanied by a certified copy of the entry of judgment and addressed to an appropriate enforcing officer — a different mechanism from the appealed-case scenario, since there is no separate court of origin to direct in an original action filed straight with the Court of Appeals.

Why the distinction between these tracks matters

A party seeking to enforce a favorable ruling needs to know which track applies: waiting for ordinary entry, seeking an immediate-execution order, or pursuing execution pending appeal through the mechanism that routes the writ back to the court of origin — each has its own procedural requirements and timing, and picking the wrong one can delay enforcement of a judgment already won.

Related provisions

Note. Statute text quoted on this page is reproduced from the official enactment and is linked to the full provision. The explanation around it is general legal information from Vivas & Nobles Law Office, not legal advice. Whether it applies to your situation depends on facts only a lawyer reviewing them can assess.