Short answer. Broadly, yes — with one exception. Section 1 of Rule 13 says the Rule governs the filing of all pleadings, motions, and other court submissions, and their service, except for those where a different mode of service is specifically prescribed.
What the law says
This Rule shall govern the filing of all pleadings, motions, and other court submissions, as well as the service thereof, except those for which a different mode of service is prescribed.
Rule 13, Section 1 — Coverage. Read the full provision →
The broad scope Rule 13 covers
Section 1 sets the coverage of the entire Rule in sweeping terms: it governs the filing of all pleadings, motions, and other court submissions, as well as the service thereof. This is a deliberately expansive scope — it is not limited to pleadings in the narrow sense, but reaches the broader category of court submissions generally, along with the mechanics of both filing them with the court and serving them on the other parties to the case. This breadth means that most of what a litigant files or serves during the ordinary course of a civil case falls within Rule 13's coverage by default.
The carve-out for different prescribed modes
The section immediately qualifies that broad scope: it applies except those for which a different mode of service is prescribed. Some specific documents or proceedings elsewhere in the Rules or in special laws come with their own dedicated service requirements — for instance, summons has its own detailed rules under a different Rule entirely. Where such a specific, different mode is prescribed, Rule 13's general framework yields to that more specific rule instead. A litigant who is uncertain whether a particular document falls under a special service rule should check for a specific provision before simply defaulting to Rule 13.
Why this matters practically
Because Rule 13 functions as the general default for filing and service, a litigant handling an ordinary motion, pleading, or court submission can generally rely on Rule 13's provisions — covered in the sections that follow, addressing what papers must be filed and served and the various modes of service available — unless they are dealing with something specifically singled out elsewhere for different treatment under a more specialized rule. Knowing which framework governs a given submission avoids the risk of using the wrong mode of service and having that service later challenged as defective.
Who is bound and the risk of getting the mode wrong
Rule 13 binds every party and counsel who files or serves a pleading, motion, or other court submission in the case, since Section 1 frames the Rule as governing that traffic generally rather than singling out any one litigant. It does not, however, reach documents that a special rule assigns to a different mode of service — summons is the clearest example, since it is governed by its own dedicated procedure rather than Rule 13's general framework. Where a litigant files or serves a paper using the wrong mode, whether by defaulting to Rule 13 when a special mode applied or by ignoring Rule 13 when it was the governing rule, courts have treated the resulting service as defective, meaning any deadline meant to run from that service never properly begins.
Related provisions
- Rule 13, Section 1 — Coverage
- Rule 13, Section 4 — Papers required to be filed and served
- Rule 13, Section 5 — Modes of [s]ervice