Short answer. Yes. Section 7 of Rule 71 provides that when the contempt consists in violating a writ of injunction, temporary restraining order, or status quo order, the respondent may also be ordered to make complete restitution to the injured party, of the property involved or an amount alleged and proved, on top of the fine or imprisonment.
What the law says
If the respondent is adjudged guilty of indirect contempt committed against a Regional Trial Court or a court of equivalent or higher rank, he may be punished by a fine not exceeding thirty thousand pesos or imprisonment not exceeding six months, or both.
Rule 71, Section 7 — Punishment for indirect contempt. Read the full provision →
What the law says
If the contempt consists in the violation of a writ of injunction, temporary restraining order or status quo order, he may also be ordered to make complete restitution to the party injured by such violation of the property involved or such amount as may be alleged and proved.
Rule 71, Section 7 — Punishment for indirect contempt. Read the full provision →
The baseline penalty for indirect contempt
Section 7 sets the punishment for indirect contempt by reference to the court involved. If the respondent is adjudged guilty of indirect contempt committed against a Regional Trial Court or a court of equivalent or higher rank, he may be punished by a fine not exceeding thirty thousand pesos or imprisonment not exceeding six months, or both. A lower penalty applies for contempt against a lower court. That fine or imprisonment is the baseline punishment, separate from what your question is asking about.
Restitution is a distinct, additional consequence
Section 7 adds something beyond the fine or imprisonment specifically for TRO violations. If the contempt consists in the violation of a writ of injunction, temporary restraining order or status quo order, he may also be ordered to make complete restitution to the party injured by such violation of the property involved or such amount as may be alleged and proved. The word also is doing real work here — restitution is layered on top of the punishment, not a substitute for it.
What restitution actually covers
Restitution under this section is tied to what the injured party actually lost because of the TRO violation — either the property involved or a monetary amount, but only to the extent that amount is alleged and proved. It is not an automatic or fixed sum; the injured party has to put forward and establish what the violation actually cost, before the court can order it returned or paid.
How this connects to enforcement
Section 7 also notes that a judgment imposing a fine is enforced through a writ of execution, as in ordinary civil actions, unless the court provides otherwise. A restitution order tied to a TRO violation is enforced as part of the same contempt judgment, which is why both the punitive fine or imprisonment and the restitution can arise from a single finding of indirect contempt for violating a TRO.