Short answer. Yes. Rule 9, Section 3(a) provides that a party in default is entitled to notice of subsequent proceedings, even though that party cannot take part in the trial. Being declared in default cuts off your ability to participate, but it does not cut off your right to be notified of what happens next.
What the law says
A party in default shall be entitled to notice[ s] of subsequent proceedings but shall not to take part in the trial.
Rule 9, Section 3 — Default; [d]eclaration of. Read the full provision →
What the law says
A party declared in default may at any time after notice thereof and before judgment, file a motion under oath to set aside the order of default upon proper showing that his or her failure to answer was due to fraud, accident, mistake or excusable negligence and that he or she has a meritorious defense.
Rule 9, Section 3 — Default; [d]eclaration of. Read the full provision →
What Section 3(a) actually says
Rule 9, Section 3(a), labeled 'effect of order of default,' states the rule directly: a party in default shall be entitled to notice of subsequent proceedings but shall not to take part in the trial. So once a court has declared you in default, this specific provision addresses exactly what you asked — whether you keep receiving notice of what happens in the case going forward.
What notice you still get
The article confirms that you remain entitled to notice of subsequent proceedings even after being declared in default. This means the case does not simply move forward silently as far as you are concerned; you are still meant to be kept informed of what is happening procedurally in the case, even though your role in actively contesting it has been curtailed by the default.
What you don't get: taking part in the trial
What you lose is different from what you keep: the same clause says a party in default shall not to take part in the trial. So while notice keeps you informed, it does not restore your ability to participate — presenting evidence, cross-examining witnesses, or otherwise actively contesting the claim during trial is what the default order takes away, distinct from the separate right to be notified of subsequent proceedings that this same clause preserves.
The separate relief-from-default option
Being entitled to notice also matters because of a separate remedy the same section provides: a party declared in default may, at any time after notice and before judgment, file a motion under oath to set aside the default order, on a proper showing that the failure to answer was due to fraud, accident, mistake, or excusable negligence and that a meritorious defense exists. Continuing to receive notice of subsequent proceedings is part of what makes it possible to actually exercise that relief-from-default option while the case is still pending.