Short answer. The sum is applied to both credits proportionally, not entirely to your personal claim. Article 1792 says that even if you gave a receipt for your own credit only, the amount collected is divided between your personal credit and the partnership's credit in proportion to their amounts.

What the law says

If a partner authorized to manage collects a demandable sum which was owed to him in his own name, from a person who owed the partnership another sum also demandable, the sum thus collected shall be applied to the two credits in proportion to their amounts, even though he may have given a receipt for his own credit only

Civil Code, Article 1792 — Application of a Collected Sum. Read the full provision →

What the law says

but should he have given it for the account of the partnership credit, the amount shall be fully applied to the latter.

Civil Code, Article 1792 — Application of a Collected Sum. Read the full provision →

The receipt you issued does not control the outcome

You might expect that issuing a receipt for your personal credit means the whole payment belongs to you, but Article 1792 says otherwise for a managing partner. It provides that the sum collected "shall be applied to the two credits in proportion to their amounts, even though he may have given a receipt for his own credit only." Because you are the managing partner and the debtor owed both you and the firm, the law splits the payment proportionally regardless of what your receipt said.

How the pro-rata split actually works

The word proportion means the payment is divided based on the relative size of each demandable amount, not split evenly in half. If your personal credit was smaller than the partnership's credit, a proportionally smaller share of what you collected is treated as satisfying your own claim, and the larger remainder goes toward the partnership's claim against the same debtor. Both credits have to be equally demandable for this rule to apply.

The exception: crediting the partnership specifically

The rule changes if you had issued the receipt "for the account of the partnership credit" instead of your own — in that case the article says "the amount shall be fully applied to the latter," meaning the entire sum goes to the partnership's credit rather than being split. This exception exists because a managing partner is trusted to direct payment toward the firm when that is what the receipt actually states, and the law honors that explicit designation instead of forcing a pro-rata division.

Why the rule exists and what it means for you as manager

This rule exists to stop a managing partner from favoring his own personal claim over the partnership's claim when he happens to be the one collecting from a shared debtor. As manager, you have a position of trust over partnership affairs, and the law does not let you use that position to collect fully for yourself while leaving the firm's demand against the same debtor unsatisfied. Since your receipt for your personal credit only does not change the pro-rata result, you should still account to the partnership for its proportional share of what you collected.

Related provisions

Note. Statute text quoted on this page is reproduced from the official enactment and is linked to the full provision. The explanation around it is general legal information from Vivas & Nobles Law Office, not legal advice. Whether it applies to your situation depends on facts only a lawyer reviewing them can assess.