Short answer. No. Article 33 says the penalty of suspension disqualifies the offender from exercising that profession or calling during the term of the sentence. The disqualification attaches to you and to the profession itself, not to one location, so you cannot sidestep it by practising the same profession somewhere else while the suspension runs.
What the law says
The suspension from public office, profession or calling, and the exercise of the right of suffrage shall disqualify the offender from holding such office or exercising such profession or calling or right of suffrage during the term of the sentence.
Revised Penal Code, Article 33 — Effect Of Suspension Penalties. Read the full provision →
Suspension bars you from the profession, not just a job
Article 33 describes what the penalty of suspension actually does. It provides that suspension from public office, profession or calling, and from the exercise of the right of suffrage, shall disqualify the offender from holding such office or exercising such profession or calling or right of suffrage during the term of the sentence. The key word is exercising. The penalty does not merely remove you from a particular post; it takes away your capacity to exercise the profession or calling at all while the sentence lasts. Practising the profession is precisely what the disqualification forbids, whoever the client is and wherever the work is done.
It follows the person, not the place
Because the penalty operates on your capacity to exercise the profession, a change of location or employer does not escape it. If you were suspended from your profession, moving to another city, another firm, or another set of clients still involves exercising such profession or calling, which is exactly what Article 33 disqualifies you from doing during the term of the sentence. The disqualification is personal to the offender for the period fixed by the court. Continuing to practise elsewhere would not be a lawful workaround; it would simply be doing the very thing the penalty prohibits, only in a different setting.
The parallel rule for public office
The article closes an obvious side-door for public officers, and the logic carries over. It adds that a person suspended from holding public office shall not hold another having similar functions during the period of his suspension. In other words, someone barred from one office cannot simply move into an equivalent one and carry on as before. That is the same anti-evasion idea that answers the profession question: the penalty is aimed at the offender's ability to perform the relevant work or duties, so it cannot be defeated by shifting to a comparable position, a comparable office, or a comparable place of practice.
How long it lasts and what it is not
The bar is tied to time. It runs during the term of the sentence, so once that term is served your capacity to exercise the profession returns; the suspension is temporary, not a permanent revocation. It is also important to see this as a criminal penalty imposed as part of a sentence. That is distinct from any separate action a professional regulatory body might take over the same conduct under its own rules, which follows its own process and timeline. Within its own sphere, though, Article 33 is clear: while the criminal suspension is in force, the profession may not be practised, here or elsewhere.