Short answer. RA 9262 funds its protections through two channels: an annual allocation written into the General Appropriations Act, and the Gender and Development (GAD) Budget that mandated agencies and local government units already set aside, which the law directs toward services for victims of violence against women and their children.
What the law says
The amount necessary to implement the provisions of this Act shall be included in the annual General Appropriations Act (GAA).
RA 9262, Section 45 — Funding. Read the full provision →
What the law says
The Gender and Development (GAD) Budget of the mandated agencies and LGU's shall be used to implement services for victim of violence against women and their children.
RA 9262, Section 45 — Funding. Read the full provision →
The two funding sources
Section 45 names two specific sources. First, the amount needed to carry out RA 9262 is meant to be included in the annual General Appropriations Act, the national budget law Congress passes each year. Second, the Gender and Development Budget already maintained by every mandated agency and local government unit is directed toward implementing services for victims. This dual structure means implementation does not rest on a single funding stream that could lapse or run out mid-year.
What GAD funds are supposed to pay for
GAD budgets exist independently of RA 9262 — every national agency and LGU is required to set one aside for gender-related programs. This section directs that pool of money toward victim services specifically, rather than leaving it entirely to each office's discretion, which is meant to give VAWC programs a funding line that does not depend solely on a fresh appropriation each year.
In practice, this is one reason VAWC-related services are frequently funded through the same office that already manages gender programs within an agency or LGU, rather than through a separate specially created fund.
Which offices carry this funding duty
The obligation reaches every agency mandated under the law — the DSWD, PNP, DOH, DOJ and the others named as Council members — as well as local government units, since much of the day-to-day response to abuse happens at the barangay and city or municipal level rather than in a national office. Because the duty is spread across so many offices, funding for victim services in practice can look different from one city or province to the next, depending on how each local government prioritizes its own GAD allocation.
Why this matters if local services seem underfunded
If a local shelter, women's desk or counseling service seems poorly resourced, this section is part of the legal basis for pressing that LGU or agency to allocate its GAD budget toward victim services, since the funding duty is written into the law itself rather than left as a purely voluntary commitment. Raising the issue with the local Sanggunian, the GAD focal person, or the DSWD field office are practical starting points, since the funding line already exists in law even where it has not yet translated into adequate services on the ground.
What this section does not do
Section 45 is a budgeting provision, not a guarantee of specific services in every locality. It does not create an individual right to sue for funding, and it does not fix an exact amount — that is left to the annual budget process. It simply establishes that funding for these programs has a designated legal source rather than none at all.
Related provisions
- RA 9262, Section 45 — Funding
- RA 9262, Section 44 — Confidentiality
- RA 9262, Section 46 — Implementing Rules