Short answer. No. For a donation of a house or any immovable, Article 749 of the Civil Code requires acceptance in a public document, and it says the acceptance shall not take effect unless it is done during the lifetime of the donor. An acceptance made only after the donor's death comes too late to perfect the donation.
What the law says
The acceptance may be made in the same deed of donation or in a separate public document, but it shall not take effect unless it is done during the lifetime of the donor.
Civil Code, Article 749 — Form Of Donations Of Immovables. Read the full provision →
What the law says
In order that the donation of an immovable may be valid, it must be made in a public document, specifying therein the property donated and the value of the charges which the donee must satisfy.
Civil Code, Article 749 — Form Of Donations Of Immovables. Read the full provision →
How a house must be donated
Article 749 sets strict formalities for gifts of real property: "In order that the donation of an immovable may be valid, it must be made in a public document, specifying therein the property donated and the value of the charges which the donee must satisfy." A public document means a notarized instrument — a private handwritten deed, however sincere, does not validly donate land or a house. And the donor's deed is only half of the transaction. A donation is a contract of pure liberality, and like any contract it is completed by the other side's assent: the donee's acceptance, which for immovables must itself appear in a public document.
Acceptance must come while the donor lives
The article then answers your question directly: "The acceptance may be made in the same deed of donation or in a separate public document, but it shall not take effect unless it is done during the lifetime of the donor." This is the general rule for donations inter vivos stated in Article 746 as well — acceptance must be made during the lifetime of the donor and of the donee. Once the donor has died, there is no one left whose offer of the gift can still be met with acceptance. The property has already passed, at the moment of death, into the donor's estate for distribution to the heirs, and a later acceptance cannot pull it back out.
Accepting in a separate document has an extra step
If you do not sign the deed of donation itself, Article 749 adds a further requirement: "If the acceptance is made in a separate instrument, the donor shall be notified thereof in an authentic form, and this step shall be noted in both instruments." The donor, in other words, must come to know of your acceptance through a formal notification, recorded on both documents. That structure only works between living parties — a deceased donor can no longer be notified of anything. The safe practice, whenever a donation of real property is intended, is to complete the whole sequence promptly: deed, acceptance, notification and annotation, all while the donor is alive and able to participate.
What happens to the house instead
Because the donation was never perfected, the house never legally left the donor. It forms part of the estate and passes under the donor's will or, absent one, by intestate succession to the legal heirs. If the donor truly meant for the property to be yours upon death, the law provides a different instrument for that intention — a disposition in a will, executed with testamentary formalities, since a gift meant to take effect at death is treated as mortis causa rather than as an ordinary donation. Whether anything can still be salvaged in a particular case — for instance, if an acceptance was actually signed earlier than the documents suggest — depends entirely on the facts and the papers, and is worth reviewing with counsel.
Cases citing this provision
These Supreme Court decisions cite the provision above. We list them so you can read them yourself; the summaries of what each decided are not ours to give.
- Department of Education Culture and Sports vs. Julia Del Rosario, et al, G.R. No. 146586, January 26, 2005 — read the decision on LawPhil →
- Heirs of Ferdinand Roxas vs. Heirs of Melania Roxas, G.R. No. 254452, November 27, 2024 — read the decision on LawPhil →
- Pablo Uy, substituted by his heirs, namely: Mylene D. Uy, Paul D. Uy, G.R. No. 227460, December 5, 2019 — read the decision on LawPhil →
- Heirs of Jose Mariano and Helen S. Mariano, represented by Danilo David S. Mariano, et al. vs. City of Naga, G.R. No. 197743, March 12, 2018 — read the decision on LawPhil →