Short answer. There's a further step. Rule 102, Section 15 requires the judge, once satisfied the person is unlawfully imprisoned, to order his discharge, but that discharge does not take effect until a copy of the order is served on the detaining officer or person, who then releases him if not appealing.

What the law says

such discharge shall not be effective until a copy of the order has been served on the officer or person detaining the prisoner. If the officer or person detaining the prisoner does not desire to appeal, the prisoner shall be forthwith released.

Rule 102, Section 15 — When prisoner discharged if no appeal. Read the full provision →

A finding triggers an order, not instant release

Once the court or judge has examined the cause of the prisoner's caption and restraint and is satisfied he is unlawfully imprisoned or restrained, the rule says he shall forthwith order his discharge from confinement — the immediate step is issuing the order. The judge's finding on the merits and the physical release of the prisoner are two separate events, and the finding by itself does not open the cell door.

Service is what actually triggers release

The order alone does not open the door: such discharge shall not be effective until a copy of the order has been served on the officer or person detaining the prisoner. Whoever is representing the detained relative should make sure a copy of the discharge order actually reaches the detaining officer promptly, rather than assuming the order's issuance alone will be enough to secure release.

What happens once served

Once served, if the officer or person detaining the prisoner does not desire to appeal, the prisoner shall be forthwith released — release follows service, conditioned on the detaining party not choosing to appeal. Where the detaining officer accepts the ruling and does not intend to contest it, the word forthwith signals that release should follow promptly, without any further unexplained delay on the detaining officer's part.

The implicit appeal option

The section's own phrasing, conditioning release on the detainer not desiring to appeal, signals that an appeal remains available and would affect the timing of release, even though this particular section does not itself spell out that appeal procedure. A detaining officer who intends to appeal the discharge order can therefore hold off on releasing the prisoner immediately, which is why service of the order alone does not guarantee the prisoner walks free that same moment. This section does not itself set a deadline for perfecting that appeal or say what happens to the prisoner's custody while it remains pending, so a family pursuing habeas relief should expect the detaining officer's decision to appeal, not the judge's finding alone, to determine how quickly release actually follows.

Related provisions

Note. Statute text quoted on this page is reproduced from the official enactment and is linked to the full provision. The explanation around it is general legal information from Vivas & Nobles Law Office, not legal advice. Whether it applies to your situation depends on facts only a lawyer reviewing them can assess.