Short answer. Yes. Rule 93, Section 8 requires that final orders or judgments under the rule be served on the civil registrar of the municipality or city where the incompetent resides, or where his property, or part of it, is situated — not merely filed with the court.
What the law says
Final orders or judgments under this rule shall be served upon the civil registrar of the municipality or city where the minor or incompetent person resides or where his property or part thereof is situated.
Rule 93, Section 8 — Service of judgment. Read the full provision →
A service duty beyond the court file
The section requires that final orders or judgments under this rule shall be served upon the civil registrar, meaning the ruling has to leave the courthouse and reach a specific outside office, not just sit in the case record. This applies whether the final order actually appoints a guardian or instead denies the petition, since the section speaks broadly of final orders or judgments under the rule rather than singling out orders of appointment alone.
Which registrar's office, and there may be more than one
Service goes to the registrar where the minor or incompetent person resides or where his property or part thereof is situated. If the ward's residence and property are in different localities, that phrasing suggests service may need to reach more than one civil registrar, so a guardian handling this step should not assume a single filing at the ward's home locality is enough if the ward also owns property elsewhere.
Why civil registry notice matters
Recording the guardianship with the civil registrar creates an official record of the ward's legal status outside the court itself, relevant to anyone later dealing with the ward, checking on his capacity, or relying on records of who is authorized to act for him. Without that outside record, a person dealing with the ward or the guardian would have to rely solely on court documents to confirm the guardianship actually exists and remains in effect. If the order is never served on the civil registrar, third parties who deal with the ward have no independent way to confirm the guardianship through registry records, and the omission does not undo the guardianship itself, since the appointment's validity rests on the court's order, not on whether the civil registrar was later notified of it.
Scope given the 2003 carve-out
As with the rest of Rule 93, this service requirement now governs guardianship orders concerning adult incompetents; guardianship orders for minors are served and recorded under the separate procedure of the 2003 Rule on Guardianship of Minors. So an order appointing a guardian for an incompetent uncle, as opposed to a minor child, is the kind of order this particular service duty to the civil registrar actually reaches.
Related provisions
- Rule 93, Section 8 — Service of judgment
- Rule 93, Section 6 — When and how guardian for nonresident appointed; Notice