Short answer. Yes. Rule 63 on declaratory relief expressly covers more than construing a contract or statute: it also authorizes an action for the reformation of an instrument, to quiet title to real property, to remove clouds from it, or to consolidate ownership after a sale with a right to repurchase, all brought under this same rule.
What the law says
An action for the reformation of an instrument, to quiet title to real property or remove clouds therefrom, or to consolidate ownership under Article 1607 of the Civil Code, may be brought under this Rule.
Rule 63, Section 1 — Who may file petition. Read the full provision →
Declaratory relief is broader than contract construction
Rule 63 is best known for letting a person interested under a deed, will, contract, or other written instrument ask a court to construe its meaning or validity, or to declare their rights or duties under it, before any breach happens. That is the classic use of declaratory relief. But the same rule does not stop there.
It expressly states that an action for the reformation of an instrument, to quiet title to real property or remove clouds therefrom, or to consolidate ownership under Article 1607 of the Civil Code, may be brought under this Rule. These are named as separate, additional actions available under Rule 63, not variations on the contract-interpretation remedy.
Quiet title and removing a cloud, specifically
A quiet title action is used when a claim, encumbrance, or document exists that appears valid on its face but actually clouds or casts doubt on the true owner's title to a piece of real property. Rule 63 names this remedy directly, alongside removing a cloud from title, meaning a property owner does not need a separate statutory basis outside this rule to bring that kind of case.
This matters because it confirms that Rule 63 is a vehicle for resolving property title disputes, not solely a mechanism for asking a court to interpret the language of a contract or statute before any dispute has actually broken out.
Reformation and consolidation of ownership are also covered
The same sentence adds two more remedies to the same rule: reformation of an instrument, which is used when a written document fails to reflect what the parties actually agreed to, and consolidation of ownership following a sale with a right to repurchase once that right has lapsed. Grouping these together with quiet title under one procedural rule means a party does not have to guess which separate proceeding applies; Rule 63 is the common vehicle for all of them.
What this means for a property title dispute
If your concern is a cloud on your title, an adverse claim, a defective document, or an instrument that does not say what it was supposed to say, Rule 63 is not limited to abstract contract questions; it is a rule your case can fit under directly. Which of these specific actions, quiet title, removal of cloud, reformation, or consolidation, best fits your situation depends on exactly what is affecting your title.
Because these remedies each have their own requirements and the facts of a title dispute vary widely, the specific document or claim clouding your title should be reviewed before deciding which action to file.