Short answer. Yes. Where a witness refreshes their memory from a writing or record, the rule requires that the writing or record be produced. The adverse party may inspect it, may cross-examine the witness upon it, and may read it in evidence.
What the law says
the writing or record must be produced and may be inspected by the adverse party, who may, if he or she chooses, cross-examine the witness upon it and may read it in evidence
Rule 132, Section 16 — When witness may refer to memorandum. Read the full provision →
Refreshing memory has a price
A witness may be allowed to refresh his or her memory respecting a fact by anything written or recorded by the witness, or under the witness's direction, at the time when the fact occurred, immediately thereafter, or at any other time when the fact was fresh in memory and the witness knew that it was correctly written or recorded. That is a real allowance. But the rule attaches a condition in the same breath: the writing or record must be produced. Using a document to help a witness testify puts that document into play.
What the adverse party gets
Three distinct things, and they escalate. The adverse party may inspect the writing or record. They may, if they choose, cross-examine the witness upon it. And they may read it in evidence. That last one carries the most weight, because it means a document brought along purely as a memory aid can end up before the court as evidence at the election of the other side. Whatever else happens to be in that document comes along with it.
What this means for preparing a witness
Think carefully about what a witness brings to the stand and refers to there. A notebook that also holds unrelated entries, marginal comments or earlier drafts is a poor choice of memory aid, because the entitlement to inspect it and to read it in evidence is not confined to the helpful parts. The safest documents are those that are contemporaneous, accurate, and confined to the matter in hand, which is close to what the rule itself describes as the qualifying conditions.
A companion rule that widens this further
The rules carry a related principle that compounds the effect. When part of an act, declaration, conversation, writing or record is given in evidence by one party, the whole of the same subject may be inquired into by the other, and when a detached item is given in evidence, any other item necessary to its understanding may also be given in evidence. So putting in a fragment can open the door to the rest of it, which is a further reason to be deliberate about what goes in at all.