Short answer. Yes, but only once it's final. Rule 69, Section 2 provides that a final order decreeing partition and accounting may be appealed by any party aggrieved by it. The initial order finding you entitled to partition and directing it is a step toward that final order, not necessarily the appealable order itself.
What the law says
If after the trial the court finds that the plaintiff has the right thereto, it shall order the partition of the real estate among all the parties in interest.
Rule 69, Section 2 — Order for partition, and partition by agreement thereunder. Read the full provision →
What the law says
A final order decreeing partition and accounting may be appealed by any party aggrieved thereby.
Rule 69, Section 2 — Order for partition, and partition by agreement thereunder. Read the full provision →
What the law says
Thereupon the parties may, if they are able to agree, make the partition among themselves by proper instruments of conveyance, and the court shall confirm the partition so agreed upon by all the parties
Rule 69, Section 2 — Order for partition, and partition by agreement thereunder. Read the full provision →
Two orders, and it's the final one that is appealable
Rule 69, Section 2 describes a process, not a single order. It starts with: if after the trial the court finds that the plaintiff has the right thereto, it shall order the partition of the real estate among all the parties in interest. That order settles the right to partition. But the appeal right the section grants is stated separately, and later: a final order decreeing partition and accounting may be appealed by any party aggrieved thereby.
What happens between the initial order and the final one
After the court finds you entitled to partition, the parties get a chance to work it out themselves: thereupon the parties may, if they are able to agree, make the partition among themselves by proper instruments of conveyance, and the court shall confirm the partition so agreed upon by all the parties. That confirmed partition, together with the accounting the section pairs it with, is what the section frames as the final, appealable step, not the earlier order that merely recognized the right to partition.
Why 'partition and accounting' are joined together
The section speaks of a final order decreeing partition and accounting, not partition alone. That phrasing signals the appealable order is the one that finishes the process, fixing how the property is actually divided and settling the accounting between the parties, rather than the earlier ruling that only established your entitlement in principle. An aggrieved party's appeal attaches to that completed, final order.
What this means for your case
If the order you have is the one finding you entitled to partition, it may still be a step in the proceeding rather than the final order decreeing partition and accounting that Section 2 makes appealable. Whether you can appeal right now depends on whether the order you are looking at is that final one, or whether the case is still at the earlier stage where the right to partition was recognized but the actual division and accounting have not yet been decreed.