Short answer. Every protection order issued under RA 9262, whether by a Punong Barangay or by a court, must display the statement VIOLATION OF THIS ORDER IS PUNISHABLE BY LAW in bold-faced type or capital letters. This visible warning puts the respondent on formal notice that ignoring the order carries criminal consequences under the Act.
What the law says
must be printed in bold-faced type or in capital letters on the protection order issued by the Punong Barangay or court
RA 9262, Section 17 — Notice Of Sanction. Read the full provision →
What the law says
VIOLATION OF THIS ORDER IS PUNISHABLE BY LAW
RA 9262, Section 17 — Notice Of Sanction. Read the full provision →
The exact wording required
Section 17 does not leave the wording of the warning to the drafter's discretion. It specifies the statement word for word, VIOLATION OF THIS ORDER IS PUNISHABLE BY LAW, and requires it to be printed in bold-faced type or in capital letters so that it cannot be overlooked on the face of the document itself, regardless of who prepared it.
Which orders this covers, and why the notice matters
The requirement applies to protection orders issued at both levels contemplated by the Act: the Barangay Protection Order issued by a Punong Barangay, and the Temporary or Permanent Protection Orders issued by a court. Whichever office issues the order, the same visible notice must appear on the copy actually handed to the respondent named in it.
The warning serves as formal, unmistakable notice to the respondent that the order is not merely advisory paperwork that can be set aside. If the respondent later violates the order, prosecution for that violation does not depend on proving the respondent separately read fine print buried elsewhere; the bold statement on the order itself establishes that the consequence was disclosed upfront.
If the notice is missing, and a practical check for petitioners
The provision does not spell out a specific remedy for a defective or missing notice, but omitting it defeats the purpose of putting the respondent on notice in the first place. A petitioner who receives a protection order without this statement can raise the omission with the issuing Punong Barangay or court and ask that a corrected copy be issued promptly, before the order is served.
For someone applying for a protection order, checking that this exact statement appears on the document is a simple but meaningful step, since it becomes the clearest evidence later on that the respondent was formally warned in writing before any alleged violation took place, which can matter once enforcement or a criminal complaint is on the table.
How the notice is typically prepared
Barangay and court personnel who prepare these orders routinely use a template that already carries the mandated statement, but it remains worth confirming on each individual copy issued, particularly when an order is drafted or reissued in a hurry, since a rushed handwritten copy is exactly the kind of document where a required line can get left out by mistake.
Related provisions
- RA 9262, Section 17 — Notice Of Sanction
- RA 9262, Section 16 — Permanent Protection Orders
- RA 9262, Section 18 — Mandatory Period To Act