Short answer. Yes, and an indigent petitioner is exempt. Section 8 authorises the registrar or consul general to collect reasonable fees as a condition for accepting the petition, then exempts an indigent petitioner from paying that fee. The Act fixes no amount and defines no test of indigency.

What the law says

The city or municipal civil registrar or the consul general shall be authorized to collect reasonable fees as a condition for accepting the petition.

RA 9048, Section 8 — Fees And Indigent Exemption. Read the full provision →

What the law says

An indigent petitioner shall be exempt from the payment of the said fee.

RA 9048, Section 8 — Fees And Indigent Exemption. Read the full provision →

Payable at the counter, and bounded by 'reasonable'

The city or municipal civil registrar or the consul general shall be authorized to collect reasonable fees as a condition for accepting the petition. Two things follow from the wording. The fee is a condition of acceptance, so it is payable when you file rather than when the decision comes — budget for it at the front of the process. And the authority is to collect reasonable fees, not whatever the office decides; the qualifier is a limit, and an officer departing from what the Act authorises is exposed to the penalty clause the same Act carries.

The exemption, and what it does not say

An indigent petitioner shall be exempt from the payment of the said fee. The exemption is stated flatly, with no discretion in it — an indigent petitioner is exempt, not may be excused. But the Act neither defines indigent nor prescribes how indigency is shown, and it does not create a form for claiming it. Those details come from the implementing rules and from the office receiving the petition, which is why the practical step is to ask that office what proof it accepts before filing rather than to arrive expecting the exemption to be self-executing.

The fee is not the whole cost

The exemption is written against the said fee — the filing fee this section authorises — and the other outlays in the process are not mentioned. Obtaining a certified true machine copy of the certificate has its own charge. So does the law enforcement certification required for a change of first name. And newspaper publication, also required only for a name change, is usually the largest single expense in the whole exercise. Anyone for whom cost is decisive should therefore be asking hard whether their problem is a clerical correction, which avoids the publication expense entirely.

Ask before you file

Three questions settle the budget: what the office's current fee schedule is, what it accepts as proof of indigency, and which of the additional documents your particular petition will need. All three are answered at the counter and none of them are in the statute. It is worth asking them in one visit before preparing anything, because Section 3 allows these petitions to be availed of only once — an application abandoned midway for want of funds is a poor use of the single attempt the law gives you.

One amendment to check before you file

Republic Act No. 10172 (2012) amended this Act after the text quoted above was enacted. It extended the same administrative route to the day and month of the date of birth and to the sex entry, neither of which the 2001 text allowed, and it set additional requirements for petitions of that kind. Nothing here sets out what those added requirements are. If what you want corrected is a birth date or the sex entry rather than a name or a misspelling, treat the procedure described above as the starting point only, and check the amended provisions before you prepare anything.

Related provisions

Note. Statute text quoted on this page is reproduced from the official enactment and is linked to the full provision. The explanation around it is general legal information from Vivas & Nobles Law Office, not legal advice. Whether it applies to your situation depends on facts only a lawyer reviewing them can assess.