Short answer. Yes. Article 2267 of the Civil Code expressly extended two specific rules to lawsuits already pending when the Code took effect on August 30, 1950: Article 29, on filing a civil case despite a criminal acquittal for reasonable doubt, and Article 33, on independent civil actions for defamation, fraud, and physical injuries. Neither rule was limited to future cases only.
What the law says
The following provisions shall apply not only to future cases but also to those pending on the date this Code becomes effective:
Civil Code, Article 2267 — Provisions Applied To Pending Cases. Read the full provision →
What the law says
(2) Article 33, concerning cases of defamation, fraud, and physical injuries.
Civil Code, Article 2267 — Provisions Applied To Pending Cases. Read the full provision →
What Article 2267 changed for ongoing lawsuits
Ordinarily, a new law is presumed to govern only future situations unless it expressly says otherwise. Article 2267 is the Civil Code's own instruction that two of its provisions do not follow that default rule. Instead of applying only going forward from August 30, 1950, Articles 29 and 33 were made to reach back into cases that were already before the courts on that date, so litigants mid-case did not lose the benefit of the new Code's approach to civil liability.
The acquittal rule it carried over
The first provision it extended, Article 29, lets an offended party pursue a civil case for damages even after the accused was acquitted in the criminal case, so long as the acquittal rested on the prosecution's failure to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt rather than a finding that the act never happened or that the accused was not the doer. Article 2267 meant this option was available even to litigants whose related criminal case, and any companion civil claim, had already begun before the Code took effect.
The independent civil action it carried over
The second provision, Article 33, lets a person injured by defamation, fraud, or physical injuries bring a civil action for damages that is entirely separate from any criminal case over the same conduct, proceeding on a lower standard of proof and moving on its own timeline regardless of how the criminal case turns out. Article 2267 made clear this separate track was open to disputes pending in 1950 too, not just ones arising after the Code's effectivity date.
Why the transitional detail still matters
Article 2267 itself is now historical, since it only governed the 1950 changeover and every case that was pending then has long since been resolved. What survives is the underlying principle it preserved: an acquittal based on reasonable doubt does not by itself bar a civil claim for the same act, and claims for defamation, fraud, or physical injuries can proceed on their own as independent civil actions under Articles 29 and 33, a distinction that still shapes how such cases are filed today.
Related provisions
- Civil Code, Article 2267 — Provisions Applied To Pending Cases
- Civil Code, Article 29 — Civil Action After Acquittal on Reasonable Doubt
- Civil Code, Article 33 — Independent Civil Action (Defamation, Fraud, Physical Injuries)